The Generative GCC Shift: Why AI Adoption Alone is No Longer Enough
Zeta42 · 25 July 2026
The inaugural ANSR and HFS Research study reveals that while 95% of Global Capability Centers run AI initiatives, true value requires shifting from execution to end-to-end product ownership.
The Death of Shared Services and the Rise of AI Hubs
A profound structural shift is rewriting the playbook for global business operations. According to the inaugural GCC Generative Enterprise Market Pulse Study by ANSR and HFS Research, the traditional "shared services" identity is fading fast. Only 17 percent of Global Capability Centers (GCCs) now describe themselves primarily as Shared Services Centers. Instead, these entities are rapidly rebranding and restructuring into Digital Transformation and Engineering Hubs, alongside dedicated AI, Data, and Automation Centers of Excellence.
At Zeta42, we observe this paradigm shift daily from our vantage point in Abu Dhabi. Organizations are no longer looking for mere execution units; they are hungry for hubs of strategic intelligence. With artificial intelligence and machine learning representing the fastest-growing capability—and more than half of surveyed GCC leaders expanding their AI capabilities over the past 18 months—the mandate has permanently shifted from basic operational delivery to complex, high-value enterprise outcomes.
The 56 Percent Premium on True Product Ownership
One of the most striking findings of the HFS Generative GCC Index is the immense value placed on autonomy. GCCs operating with true end-to-end product ownership lift their index score by a massive 56 percent compared to execution-only centers. This performance gap signals a permanent shift toward measuring the actual products, platforms, and intellectual property that these centers completely own.
While an overwhelming 95 percent of GCCs have active AI initiatives underway, very few have fundamentally redesigned their core operating models around artificial intelligence. Currently, the greatest tangible value is being rapidly realized in three key areas:
- Software development productivity: Accelerating deployment cycles through automated code generation.
- Business process automation: Streamlining repetitive workflows to free up cognitive bandwidth.
- Decision intelligence: Leveraging advanced data models to guide strategic enterprise choices.
To capture that 56 percent premium, organizations must move beyond using AI as a basic efficiency tool. They must empower their teams with the decision authority to build and own proprietary AI assets from start to finish.
Bridging the Ecosystem Gap in AI Infrastructure
The physical foundations for this new era are being built at an unprecedented scale, highlighted by over $45 billion in AI infrastructure investment currently being built across India. However, physical infrastructure is only half of the equation. The study points to a critical vulnerability: GCC engagement with the wider innovation ecosystem remains surprisingly limited, with many centers reporting no major ecosystem collaboration.
This isolation represents a significant bottleneck. For capability centers to transition into true engines of the generative enterprise, they cannot operate in silos. Navigating the rapidly evolving global AI landscape requires continuous interaction with academic institutions, specialized AI academies, startup accelerators, and regional technology hubs.
From AI Adoption to Generative Enterprise Mastery
As Achyuta Ghosh, Executive Research Leader at HFS Research, aptly noted:
"AI adoption alone will not move them forward. AI at scale must be combined with ownership, decision authority, and ecosystem orchestration to define the Generative Enterprise era."
For forward-thinking leaders across the Gulf and the global GCC landscape, the lesson is clear. The value delivered by AI and automation is now the primary measure of business impact. To secure a permanent seat at the strategic enterprise table, we must move past simple adoption. True leadership in this new era requires a deep commitment to upskilling, systemic operating model redesign, and active ecosystem orchestration.
Source: manilatimes.net